Skip to content

Jack the Giant Slayer (2013)

August 23, 2013

VERDICT:
4/10 Misty Mountains

This is just getting ridiculous.

Jack the Giant Slayer is about a peasant boy from England who, on one fateful day, goes into town to sell the family horse. As fate would have it, nothing goes as planned. The horse gets stolen, he nearly gets killed for crossing paths with the princess, and all he has to show for it is a handful of “magic beans.” He goes back home with his head held low and soon finds out that his beans are no joke. In a mere matter of seconds, a huge-ass beanstalk shoots out of the ground and takes his whole damn home along with it. Not only that, but the damn princess is locked inside because she’d run away from home. Realizing that a beanstalk is no place for a princess, the peasant boy teams up with all the king’s men to rescue the girl and bring her back to safety. They reach the top, survey the land that’s floating in the clouds and soon come to realize that the legends are true. This land belongs to giants, and them giants hold a grudge.

Alright, that’s enough of that.

I’m gonna go out on a limb here and assume I wasn’t the only one throwing shade at this nonsense when they first saw the trailer. I understand the logic that comes with Hansel and Gretel becoming witch hunters, but this? This is a bit much. To its credit, it just now dawned on me that it isn’t in fact based on Jack and the Beanstalk like I originally thought. Amazingly enough, someone in the 18th Century actually wrote a folk tale called Jack the Giant Killer that, to the best of my knowledge, isn’t far off from what this is about. And while it sure would have been nice to know that from the start, that doesn’t make this sound any less stupid.

Am I the only one who was unaware of this? My childhood suddenly feels so…deprived. Anyway, the upside to all this is that Jack starts out strong.

I don’t know about you, but is there a better way to start off a movie than with a Warwick Davis cameo? Of course there’s not, don’t bother debating it. And how about that Nicholas Hoult? No matter how many times I say it, I still can’t believe that’s the kid from About a Boy. The novelty hasn’t faded and he’s turned into quite the leading man to boot. Speaking of broken records, I still and always will have all kinds of time for my man Ewan McGregor. Always great to see him play the occasional badass and, boy, is he rocking some awfully sharp duds. Don’t even get me started on the hair. Ain’t no giant gonna mess with that hair.

And let’s not forget about Stanley Tucci. Too bad his character’s such an under-developed, single-minded prick of a bad guy, but hey, it’s Stanley Tucci we’re talking about. The man can do no wrong.

Bonus points for Ian McShane. Someone give that man more work.

Now that I think about it, it doesn’t start off strong as much as it successfully casts some actors that I like. The only real eyebrow-raiser of the bunch being Bryan Singer in the director’s chair, a casting decision that is by and large the most confusing thing about this movie. Please refer back to the title to fully appreciate the gravity of that statement.

Remember when Bryan Singer was doing stuff like The Usual Suspects and the first two X-Men movies? Those were some good times, huh? Dude had his whole career ahead of him, but for reasons that may forever elude me, he takes the check and signs on for this. Poor guy must be hard up these days because this is so far beneath the man who gave us Superman Returns. That’s right, Superman Returns was good. There, I said it.

I really don’t know why he bothered with this. For a special director who’s wowed us all before. there’s really nothing special about it. Maybe he had kids or something and he’s pulling a George Lucas. Whatever the reason, his name is attached and there’s nothing we can do about it now. Single tear.

So, what can we assume he was at least trying to accomplish here? Well if Jack the Giant Slayer was out to achieve anything, face value implies that it was out to entertain. As nice as that would have been, it doesn’t really happen. Not to say that it’s torture by any means, it just isn’t what I was hoping for: that it would somehow rise above my low expectations. I wanted it to make me laugh on occasion, despite my assumption that it most likely wouldn’t. I wanted the cast to live up to their potential, to infuse this thing with some character that didn’t feel stock. Sadly, these things did not happen.

The whole time I was watching, I was waiting for that moment where disbelief would suspend and this war against giants suddenly wouldn’t seem so ridiculous. After all, I’ve seen my fair share of movies that ended up being surprisingly good despite their own premise. If they could do it, so Jack. Unfortunately for Aiden, this too does not happen.

What we have here is not much more than a by-the-books story that follows another unlikely hero in his quest to save another princess in distress. It’s Super Mario Bros. (the game, not the movie), only way less fun and with more 3D (even though that franchise is now full of 3D). The dialogue’s also stale, there’s a surprising amount of it to be had and there’s only so much the cast can do to save it. As for the laughs, well, that all depends. If your problem with, say, Seinfeld, boils down to a serious lack of boogers and farts, then git ‘er done, this one’s for you. For everyone else, there’s always TBS.

On the bright side, the kids’ll love it. Farting giants and PG-13? What’s not to love? And in case I’m coming off harsher than needed, it’s worth reiterating that this isn’t a bad movie. I saw it on a plane, it served its purpose. But if I hadn’t been taking notes to remember all this stuff, I doubt I would have had this much to say. Jack the Giant Slayer could have been better, but given its goddamn premise and title, it definitely could have been worse. It is what it is and it’s oh so forgettable.

PS: What was up with that dumbass, non-twist of an ending? Seriously, who thinks of this stuff?

Advertisements
17 Comments leave one →
  1. August 23, 2013 7:10 am

    Great write-up, man. Can’t say I was all that impressed with this either. A wasted opportunity.

    • August 23, 2013 9:52 am

      Thanks! Didn’t see much opportunity to begin with outside of grifting all us hardworking folk with another unnecessary fairy tale reboot that no one asked for, but yeah, I guess they wasted that one, too. Can’t wait ’til this fad runs its course already.

  2. August 23, 2013 9:18 am

    I haven’t seen it yet, but I had no desire to from the get go. Also – and I fear we differ on this – I’m not a big fan of Ewan McGregor. That’s probably what sealed the deal for me not seeing the movie. That, and I’m tired of Hollywood taking my favorite childhood stories and fairy tales and turning them into crap!

    Great review, though! I love your writing and I love your honest opinions!

    • August 23, 2013 9:56 am

      Oh man, McGregor’s my boy. Dude’s always done me right, but hey, different strokes for different folks. And I have no idea what’s up with Hollywood and all these fairy tale reboots either. Almost all of them are awful and I have no idea why they keep happening. One of history’s mysteries, I suppose.

      And thanks! I do what I can and appreciate the compliment! Now continue avoiding this terribly forgettable movie!

  3. Movies Hunt permalink
    August 26, 2013 2:39 pm

    Great review! I Love your writing as well but I was not excited for this movie major disappointment!

    • August 26, 2013 2:45 pm

      Thanks! Much appreciate the kind words and sorry to hear it was a disappointment for you as well. Only met one person who thought otherwise and I’m still waiting for an explanation from him. Serenity now, Hollywood. Serenity now.

      Thanks for stopping by!

  4. August 29, 2013 6:13 pm

    Skip this Jack. Look for Jack The Giant Killer from 1962 instead.

  5. September 27, 2013 4:38 am

    Maybe if I didn’t care enough to see who the director was, I wouldn’t have been disappointed THAT much. But I did, and I was. Great review, sir!

    • September 27, 2013 12:53 pm

      Hahaha. Definitely would have changed things for the better, man. But alas…

      Thanks, man!

  6. September 30, 2013 6:10 am

    This is the best review of that “magic beans” stuff I’ve read, but the only point I’d question is “the kids’ll love it”. Not my kids, that’s for sure. It’s too long, scary and cruel for the kids. I don’t mean the giants are scary – no, they’re quite awkward and funny. But the king’s men who are climbing the giant beanstalks to rescue the princess and one of them cutting the rope so that his fellow friends fall down and die – how’s that? Now that is way too much, I think. Wouldn’t ever agree kids should see that.

    • October 2, 2013 1:12 pm

      Haha. Why thank you! And that is a good point about Stanley Tucci offing those guys like a total jerk. You’re right, not the kind of thing I’d be keen to show my kids. Now that I think about it, the kids deserve better than this. That’s what Studio Ghibli is for.

      Thanks for stopping by!

  7. September 26, 2014 11:39 am

    The film is not bad. For children this can be a nice film to watch.

Trackbacks

  1. » Movie Review – Jack The Giant Slayer Fernby Films
  2. The Best Movies of 2013: #86 – #66 | Cut The Crap Movie Reviews

Drop that knowledge!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: