Skip to content
Advertisements

Green Lantern (2011)

June 18, 2011

VERDICT:
5/10 Emerald Knights

Lots to look at and that’s about it.

In a nutshell, it’s worth seeing for Peter Sarsgaard and some cool fight scenes. What a shame, especially since GL is such a badass superhero. Well, there’s always the sequel.

Hit the jump for the full review, yo!

http://blog.moviefone.com/2011/06/17/green-lantern-review/

Advertisements
5 Comments leave one →
  1. June 19, 2011 11:28 am

    I can’t say I’m that surprised that this film is receiving some mediocre reviews. I didn’t think much of the trailer and it seems that has carried through to the full film.

    • June 20, 2011 6:34 pm

      It’s really too bad how underwhelming this ended up being, mainly because Green Lantern is such a badass superhero. Idk, in retrospect, felt pretty limited when it came to the imagination department…amongst other problems. But let me reiterate: thank God for Peter Sarsgaard.

  2. June 19, 2011 7:58 pm

    Glad to see somebody else thought that this was at least OK. It wasn’t terrible, just a bunch of pretty colors and some good action. Good Review Aiden!

    • June 20, 2011 6:36 pm

      Thanks! And yeah, pretty surprised at the extreme hate this is getting. Thought it was fine, but it really did have the potential to be so much more.

  3. June 27, 2011 6:42 am

    I thought it was loud flashy and pretty boring in parts. The effects were to much for me pretty good CGI but almost no practical effects so it felth empty to me.

    Better than Superman worse than Thor. Nice popcorn movie.

Drop that knowledge!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: